Baby Hears for the First Time and Laughs

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing iv out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-nineteen Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just every bit disturbing as the data is the fact that the report authors evidently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth almost vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attending past a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double bank check all the math. In doing so, we were able to ostend two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yep, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their brownie.

In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data really show quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their offset or 2d trimesters. (Yous have to read the fine print below the table to encounter this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their outset or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hitting the 20-calendar week mark. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first xx weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or 2nd trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the 3rd trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their tertiary trimester, past definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should accept used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is incommunicable for a adult female who was vaccinated for the showtime time during her third trimester to accept a "spontaneous ballgame" in the starting time xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the start 20 weeks (and meaning women aren't fourth dimension travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to prevarication with statistics," because they patently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand fox to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more four out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this information set. (It's a small prepare of 127 meaning women, and then we'd similar to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in social club to become a more than clear picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A unproblematic manner to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a purse of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science written report asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and attain the number l. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are xanthous" because it'southward 50/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, non lemons. And then the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct respond.

In this scientific discipline paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since meaning women aren't time travelers, they can't go back in time and written report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with quack obfuscation of the numbers — and then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "bear witness-based" conclusions to sympathize the world around us.

Yet when four out of v pregnant women lose their babies in the get-go 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is just 12.6%. Why? Because they're roofing upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is too named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same fault in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For instance, here'southward another study he co-authored: "Adverse events later Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Agin Effect Reporting Organisation (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected rubber concerns after TIV-ID."

But is that determination based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We phone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this aforementioned written report architect has fabricated the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time ane author was found to accept made systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We tin can't just accept bad math and call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike poly peptide injections into meaning women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean fourth dimension, information technology's clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first xx weeks (at least, according to the pocket-sized information set we have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) evidence that covid vaccine spike proteins directly set on reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, information technology should be no surprise any that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking meaning women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on meaning women is "shameful." Yous can hear him in his ain words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet by iii.2 million over the next yr, in the United states solitary, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies beingness murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "barbarism."

The fields of medicine and scientific discipline have turned confronting humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike poly peptide bioweapons that are causing strokes, center attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human being race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's country management czar once characterized human being children as an "environmental hazard."

This is a state of war. A bioweapons attack. And information technology goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the unabridged homo race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated past a desire to assistance humanity, simply are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity's devastation.

Larn more in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

walkerinvints.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post